<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>FRCP Compliance</title>
	<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com</link>
	<description>how to manage electronic compliance for public and private companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>FRCP Compliance: Rule 26</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule 26 is one of the many rules that govern the discovery process. In order to achieve FRCP compliance, understanding of Rule 26 and it’s role is important. In summary, Rule 26 covers the parties’ duty to disclose and other general provisions governing discovery. It defines what is considered discoverable Electronically Stored Information (ESI). The [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2010/01/14/frcp-compliance-rule-26/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Amendments to FRCP in 2006 Prompt E-Discovery’s High-Growth Pace</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent report from world-renown research analyst firm Gartner, forecasts the e-Discovery market to surpass $1.2 billion. This will be a (huge!) 23% increase from 2009. One couldn’t deny the importance of the e-Discovery process, but seeing an actual forecast is encouraging. As the world shifts to cloud computing and putting everything in electronic form, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2009/12/21/amendments-to-frcp-in-2006-prompt-e-discovery%e2%80%99s-high-growth-pace/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>FRCP Rules &amp; California&#8217;s New E-Discovery Rules Compared</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The state of California has its own set rules for e-Discovery that does share key similarities to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but also share some differences. A wonderfully brief and concise blog posting from Rob Robinson on his InfoGovernance Engagement Area blog defines each of these. I encourage blog readers to visit his blog directly [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2009/12/09/frcp-rules-californias-new-e-discovery-rules-compared/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Producing Data in a Timely and Complete Manner for FRCP Compliance</title>
		<description><![CDATA[FRCP Rule 34 is vital to understand for ensured FRCP compliance. This specific rule defines procedures for the production of documents, which includes electronically stored information (ESI). What does the rule define as ESI? Writings; Drawings; Graphs; Charts; Photographs; Sound Recordings; Images; And other data or data compilations. Included in the contents of the request [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2009/11/30/producing-data-in-a-timely-and-complete-manner-for-frcp-compliance/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Backup Tapes Are Not The Best Solution For FRCP Compliance</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with backup tapes isn't actually storing the data, it is producing relevant messages efficiently when requested by legal counsel for FRCP compliance. The task of going through a backup tape and to find specific messages is difficult and time-consuming. One of the key aspects of FRCP compliance is being able to produce relevant [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2009/11/19/backup-tapes-are-not-the-best-solution-for-frcp-compliance/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>FRCP Compliance: Know The Basics</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) were established in 1938 and underwent significant revisions in 1948, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1993, 2000 and 2006. When it comes to email archiving and e-discovery, the revision that took effect in December 2006 is important to know and understand. Fundamentally, the revision required organizations to [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.frcpcompliance.com/2009/11/13/frcp-compliance-know-the-basics/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

